1. The applicant’s name, mailing address, and telephone number.
The Alabama Charter Fishing Association Cooperative c/o Iris Etheridge, Cooperative Manager 26619 Perdido Beach Blvd. Orange Beach, AL 36561
(251) 981-4007
The Alabama Charter Fishing Association Cooperative consists of the ________ members:
Any and all active Alabama licensed CFH with a EEZ LAPP permit may join as members.
At the time of this application The ACFAC( Alabama Charter Fishing Association Cooperative) members are as follows:
See attached list
The Orange Beach Fishing Association P. O. Box 222 Orange Beach, AL 36561
Research Partners:
1. Greg Stunz, Harte Research Institute, Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M University- Corpus Christi
2. State of Alabama
2. A statement of the purposes and goals of the exempted fishery for which an EFP is needed, including justification for issuance of the EFP.
Purposes and Goals
We request approval by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), for a two-year Exempted Fishing Permit (EFP) to test an alternative management system for the charter for hire industry.
The Alabama Charter Fishing Association Cooperative (Cooperative) is a group of charter for hire captains who seek to conduct a pilot project to evaluate the efficacy of an allocation-based system to more effectively manage red snapper.
The for-hire industry, charter vessels, is the primary means for the general non- boat owning public around the country to access the fishery resources in the Gulf of Mexico. The for-hire industry has lost an average of 39 permits per year since implementation of the for-hire reef fish permit moratorium in 2003. The purpose of this pilot project is to test an
alternative approach to managing the charter for hire sector in an attempt to preserve an industry that provides valuable public access to resources while supporting jobs and local economies. As charter for hire business owners, we believe that increased flexibility to structure our fishing activities
will enable us to operate more stable and profitable businesses with a long-term stake in sustainable Gulf fisheries.
The goals of the charter for hire pilot project are to:
1. Assess whether a cooperative program can achieve conservation and economic goals more effectively than the existing management system.
2. Test a new electronic data collection method and evaluate its effectiveness in providing accurate, next to real-time catch and effort data.
3. Provide Information for a comparative socio-economic study between the existing charter for hire industry, and the ACFAC (Alabama Charter Fishing Association Cooperative) before, during, and after the pilot project, to determine the potential economic impacts of an alternative management method on the charter for hire industry.
4. Test the ability of regional management to see if this is a feasible plan for the state to control their regional fisheries. To work in partnership with Alabama’s conservation and other state official to develop, administer and test whether regional management should be chosen as a alternative FMP.
Under the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico (FMP) the recreational sector receives an annual catch limit (ACL) for certain species based on harvest projections provided by NMFS. The current management system for recreational fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico utilizes traditional tools
such as bag limits, size limits, and shortened seasons to remain within the ACL, and to achieve the other goals and objectives outlined in the FMP. Although managed along with the broader recreational sector, the for-hire industry has operated under a limited access system since 2003 (Reef Fish Amendment 20). The businesses that comprise the for hire industry operate under different regulatory requirements than do private anglers.
Due to the lack of real-time accountability measures to monitor catches in the recreational sector, the annual catch targets for red snapper have been exceeded in 15 of the last 20 years. These overages have posed challenges to the conservation and management of Gulf of Mexico reef fish, and in particular red snapper. Lack of effective mechanisms to account for catches also has harmed the recreational sector in general, and the charter for hire industry in particular, by requiring the imposition of stricter controls to manage catches and to address the conservation implications from exceeding catch limits in prior years. These measures have forced excessive regulatory discards and imposed economic hardship on the charter for hire fleet through the continual shortening of fishing seasons. The Charter boat for hire pilot project would be able to test a mechanism to report catch in real-time, which could be used as a model to more effectively monitor catch in-season and thereby prevent overages in the recreational sector.
Regulatory responses to over harvesting in the recreational sector and poor stock assessments have resulted in shorter fishing seasons, reduced bag limits, and other factors that make it difficult to operate successful charter for hire businesses. Since charter boat operators can now only fish for certain species during brief seasons in each year, they often lose out on potential customers during periods
of high tourist traffic along the coasts that do not coincide with those open fishing seasons. In addition, even long-time customers are losing confidence that if they book a chartered trip in advance that the fishing seasons for their target species will be open by the time their fishing trip occurs. This lack of certainty makes customers reluctant to book fishing trips.
In recent years, the charter for hire industry brought its challenges to the Council and asked for assistance in addressing them. In response, the Council formed an ad hoc charter for hire headboat Advisory Panel (AP) in 2011, composed of charter for hire captains, to evaluate alternative management options for improving the health of the industry. The AP met in 2011 and discussed the significant challenges faced by the charter for hire headboat industry, which included: the inability for customers to fish when fishing is most valuable to them (inability to set season); the lack of safety in a derby fishery; the lack of stability in the crew, and the challenge of keeping good captains and deckhands on a consistent basis; the financial challenges presented by shorter seasons to the industry even though the fish stocks are increasing; the decreasing value of businesses within the current regulatory climate; the inability to make
capital improvements and the devaluation of the vessels and businesses; the slow data collection which leads to overfishing and triggers accountability measures; and regulatory discards.
The AP members discussed changes they wanted to see in the fishery, and debated various options for obtaining those changes. After careful deliberation, the AP concluded that an individual fishing quota program, an allocation-based management system, would most effectively address the challenges faced by the charter for hire industry because it would give charter boats the flexibility to operate year-round and when their customers wanted to go fishing. It would allow charter for hire vessels to set their own seasons to maximize economic benefit to businesses, promote safety at sea, and ensure public access to the fish and to the most efficient method of harvest. The AP proposed a design for a pilot prgroam for the
Council’s consideration.
3.0 Structure of the Proposed Cooperative Program
Operating under an EFP, the Cooperative seeks to test on a pilot basis a modified version of the AP’s recommended design to determine if an allocation-based system could achieve the goals and objectives of the FMP more effectively than current management. To enable the Cooperative to carry out its goals for this pilot project, a portion of the red snapper ACLs corresponding to the Cooperative members’ percentage of landings would be made available for use for
Cooperative activities occurring under the EFP.
Specifically, we propose that the quantity of fish available for use by Cooperative activities be calculated by NMFS based as a precentage of the alabama charter for hire landings relative to Alabama regional TAC.
Alabama regional 2014 TAC estimated under proposed regional management is 30% of Total Recreational TAC of which the Alabama CFH averaged historical landing represent 46%. This percentage of Alabama’s TAC will be distributed among all currently licensed active Alabama CFH and be calculated as one share to six packs vessels and two shares to multi vessels.
All six pack vessels will receive the same number of pounds/fish. All Multi-passenger vessels will receive the same number of pounds/fish. (Example for every one fish a six pack receive the multi will receive two fish.)
This method would ensure that the Cooperative catches proportionally similar amounts of red snapper under the EFP as reported in prior fishing years. By limiting the amount of fish available to the Cooperative to its members’ historical catch levels will ensure that season lengths and regulatory restrictions for private recreational sector would not be affected by this EFP. In other words, the red snapper season lengths for the general recreational sector would be the same duration regardless of whether or not this EFP was effective.
NMFS and Alabama State officials would convert this portion of the ACLs (expressed in pounds of fish) into a fixed number of individual red snapper using a formula to approximate the average weight of fish expected to be caught on charter for hire trips . Average weights would be based on average weights from the prior season as adjusted for increases in weight associated with stock rebuilding. The Cooperative would thereby have a fixed number of red snapper that its members could harvest throughout the 2014 and 2015 calendar years. Once the EFP is approved, Cooperative members would be allowed to land red snapper for the duration of the calendar year or until the Cooperative’s quotas for red snapper are used up.
To ensure 100% catch accountability and to enable a transparent monitoring system, the Cooperative would adhere to strict protocols to track each fish caught and landed during a charter for hire trip. As a participating captain is leaving the dock, he/she would “hail out” using Isnapper or by calling in. The captain would receive a confirmation number for that particular trip. This confirmation number would be entered into the iSnapper computer application (see section on
data collection below). Before returning to the dock, the charter for hire captain would enter the species and number of fish caught into the iSnapper system, which will also collect approximate GPS location to identify fishing zones. At the end of the trip, the captain would “hail in” using Isnapper or by calling in one hour prior to landing, alerting law enforcement and port agents to his/her return, and allowing for a dockside intercept if deemed necessary by enforcement and any charter for hire port samplers.
By using iSnapper, the Cooperative would maintain a real-time, internet-based tracking system to ensure that each fish was accounted for. The iSnapper data would be collected on remote servers and sent directly to NMFS and state officials.
Each Cooperative member would maintain an electronic vessel account with NMFSand/or state officals, specifying the numbers of red snapper that could be caught. As fish are caught, they would be deducted from the remaining fish in each member’s vessel account.
The Cooperative would operate pursuant to contractual agreements between members.
These agreements would require each member to:
(i) abide by all federal fishing regulations and specific requirements imposed by NMFS under this EFP;
(ii) agree that by participating in the pilot program, vessels will not be able to participate in the regular red snapper recreational open fishing season for the year meaning they can only fish the allotment of red snapper given to each vessel. They can fish during the regular red snapper recreational open fishing season provided they still have not caught their allowance but it is clearly understood vessels can NOT fish their allotment and also the regular season within the same year.; retain all legal-sized fish that appear to be mortally injured (a minimum of 16” for red snapper) caught by anglers on their vessel as long as the vessel has not reached its catch limits for those species (i.e., full retention of mortally injured red snapper and until catch limits are reached, and mandatory release thereafter) and bag limits for the vessel have not been reached;
(iii) agree to a two-fish per person maximum daily bag limit to be consistent with current recreational fishing regulations;
(iv) account and collect data for each individual red snapper caught aboard that member’s boat using the iSnapper program.
(v) strictly adhere to the catch limits applicable to the Cooperative, including holding a portion of the Cooperative’s total catch limit in reserve to guard against overfishing by one member;
(vi) cease targeted fishing for red snapper upon exhausting that member’s distribution of fish (regardless of whether the general recreational season is otherwise open for those species).
(vii) install, maintain and operate a internet based reporting system as approved.
(viii) provide enforcement agents with notification upon leaving and returning to a preapproved landings location (“hail in/hail out”) and abide by any other enforcement or dockside monitoring requirements implemented by the Cooperative or at the request of NMFS;
(ix) agree that red snapper distributions will only be used by Cooperative members carrying out the EFP;
(x) forego any privileges of fishing during the general recreational seasons for red snapper under a charter for hire limited access permit for any vessel enrolled in the Cooperative for that fishing year. Participating vessels would engage in fishing based on the terms and conditions outlined in the EFP only;
(xi) abide by decisions of the Cooperative’s Board, as well as the Cooperative Manager (who would be elected by the Board and responsible for communicating with NMFS during the course of the pilot program while the EFP is valid).
NMFS could terminate the EFP for all participants even if only a single participant is responsible for violating the terms and conditions of the EFP. See 50 C.F.R. § 600.745(b)(8). Accordingly, pursuant to the Cooperative contracts and any terms and conditions outlined in the EFP, failure to abide by the applicable contractual and EFP provisions could result in:
1) warning letters, “stop fishing” orders and/or monetary penalties from the Cooperative, enforceable by court order;
2) expulsion from the Cooperative and termination of that member’s ability to participate in the Cooperative and pilot program;
3) forfeiture to NMFS without compensation of any distributions of fish issued to an expelled member; and
4) disclosure of the violation to the NMFS along with a request to remove the offending member’s vessel(s) from the list of vessels authorized to fish under the EFP (effectively terminating that member’s ability to target red snapper for that year).
At the end of first year of the pilot program, participants could choose to opt out of the pilot program and not participate for the second year. The Cooperative also desires flexibility to add new participants, subject to vote by the Cooperative’s Board, to the EFP who wish to join the pilot for the 2015 calendar year, and who would be subject to the same conditions as the original participants. The amount of the ACLs made available for use under year two of the EFP would be adjusted according to the modified number of participants and based on the formula described above. For the purposes of this pilot project, we request that we be exempted from the following regulations pertaining to red snapper:
1. Seasonal openings and closures;
2. Any other necessary or appropriate regulations as determined by NMFS to carry out the pilot program.
The pilot project seeks these exemptions to assess whether the conservation and economic goals outlined in the FMP for the Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act can be better achieved through an alternative management system.
At the close of each of the two years of the pilot program, the Advisory Panels will reconvene to review the progress of the pilot based on the project goals listed above. The research partners will present their findings to the AP. The Panel should consider the status of the research initiatives, as well as the
opinions of the pilot program participants. The AP will present its findings to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council.
4.0 Data Collection
This charter for hire pilot will provide further opportunity to test a new electronic data collection method and evaluate its effectiveness in providing accurate, next to real-time catch data. The iSnapper is an iPhone/iPad application developed by the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi (Harte Institute) and funded by NOAA’s Cooperative Research Program. It is currently being tested in the charter industry with high success. The charter for hire pilot represents another opportunity to test the utility of the device by expanding the data collection options. This project will particularly be a value in assessing the socio-economic data collection
1 Stunz, Greg; Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
component of this device (e.g., estimating the economic impacts). Dr. Greg Stunz, the lead PI on the iSnapper, has agreed to make the program available for this pilot study. Charter for Hire operators in the Cooperative using the iSnapper input catch data into the iPhone/iPad, such as number of fish, location of capture, and discard information along with socioeconomic data about the anglers involved. These data are collected on remote servers at the Harte Institute, and could be made easily available over the internet to a variety of users, such as Cooperative participants, in the form of reports and spreadsheets. NMFS would also receive the data directly from the Harte Institute. Data collected will be used to track catch and effort, but could also be used to answer biological questions, such as those related to discards, out-of-season mortality, and predation mortality. In addition, the iSnapper will be able to collect socio-economic data concerning fishermen in the pilot program (see Socio-economic Study below).
The possibility of using iSnapper to submit data directly to the NMFS will be explored with the NMFS Southeast Fisheries Science Center and the Harte Institute. Any other trip information and or logbooks will be provided if directed by NMFS and or state officials.
5.0 Socio-Economic Study
The pilot project offers a unique opportunity to evaluate the impacts of an alternative management system on the economic performance of the charter for hire industry. It also provides a valuable opportunity to customize data collection to maximize their usefulness for answering important management questions. Academic researchers, in collaboration with the Alabama Charter Fishing Association Cooperative, will conduct a socio-economic study of the ex ante effects of the change in charter for hire cooperative management using currently available data sources. Simultaneously, they will develop additional survey instruments to gather economic data for ex post analysis of the effects of the pilot project on Cooperative vessels after its first and second years. Data collection will emphasize ex post impacts of the pilot project. A partial list of impacts to assess in the study includes:
1. How has the pilot project changed the temporal and spatial distributions of fishing by Cooperative members?
2. How has the number of anglers/customers changed as a result of Cooperative members being able to better target their trips to the seasonality of demand?
3. Do charter for hire owners utilize increased flexibility to provide a more differentiated recreational product to customers?
4. How has the pilot project affected the cost and net revenue associated with a representative trip?
Data collection will include trip-level catch and effort characteristics (e.g. retained and discarded catch, spatial location, and number of customers), trip and season-level variable revenues and costs (e.g. trip pricing, gear, bait, ice, fuel, and maintenance expenditures), and labor employment and compensation information. Many trip-level data will be collected using the iSnapper application, whereas seasonal data will be collected through supplementary survey instruments.
6.0 – Justification
The FMP for the Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico (1984) was instituted by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) to address several key problems in the fishery, including declining fish stocks, for which overfishing by directed recreational and commercial users is stated as a known factor. Another problem listed was that “an insufficient data base exists to pinpoint the
causes and magnitude of the decline by exact geographical area.”
To address these problems, the Council set as its goal that the fishery “attain the greatest overall benefit to the Nation with particular reference to food production and recreational opportunities on the basis of the maximum sustainable yield as modified by relevant economic, social, or ecological factors.”
In addition, as its objectives for the FMP, the Council listed the following:
1. to rebuild the declining reef fish stocks wherever they occur within the fishery;
2. to establish a fishery reporting system for monitoring the reef fish fishery;
3. to conserve reef fish habitats and increase reef fish habitats in appropriate areas and to provide protection for juveniles while protecting existing and new habitats; and
4. to minimize conflicts between user groups of the resource and conflicts for space.
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act also establishes National Standards for Fishery Conservation and Management that must be applied to all fishery management plans. The charter for hire pilot addresses several in particular:
1) Conservation and management measures shall prevent overfishing while achieving, on a continuing basis, the optimum yield from each fishery for the United States fishing industry.
By instituting a near real-time monitoring program to account for all landings, the pilot project will help ensure that the Cooperative meets but does not exceed its catch limits. If successful, the program could thus help prevent overfishing while achieving optimum yield. A persistent management problem in the recreational sector has been the exceeding of catch limits for certain reef fish species, sometimes by large amounts, that hampers efforts to conserve, manage and rebuild these species. This pilot program is designed to test a different management approach along with the use of cutting-edge data collection methods to determine whether catch limits can be adhered to more effectively in the recreational sector.
(2) Conservation and management measures shall be based upon the best scientific information available.
The monitoring and data collection programs implemented by the pilot project will provide substantial data on the economic and conservation aspects of the charter for hire fishery. These include hail in/hail out requirements, as well as use of VMS and iSnapper. The pilot project thus will help determine whether there are alternative or better methods of collecting scientific information
necessary for management purposes.
(3) Conservation and management measures shall, where practicable, consider efficiency in the utilization of fishery resources; except that no such measure shall have economic allocation as its sole purpose.
The charter for hire provide one of the most efficient means of recreational harvest, because they enable resource access to a large number of anglers at the lowest cost per individual. By attempting to preserve the charter for hire sector through exploring an alternative management approach, the pilot project will help ensure the FMP maintains compliance with this standard.
(4) Conservation and management measures shall, consistent with the conservation requirements of this Act (including the prevention of overfishing and rebuilding of over fished stocks), take into account the importance of fishery resources to fishing communities by utilizing economic and social data that meet the requirements of paragraph (2), in order to (A) provide for the sustained participation of such communities, and (B) to the extent practicable, minimize adverse economic impacts on such communities.
One overriding purpose of the pilot program is to determine whether an allocation- based system can help preserve the charter for hire industry and the families,jobs, and communities that industry supports throughout the Gulf of Mexico. The current FMP is not providing for sustained participating of these fishing communities, and the pilot program is designed to test an alternative approach.
(5) Conservation and management measures shall, to the extent practicable, (A) minimize bycatch and (B) to the extent bycatch cannot be avoided, minimize the mortality of such bycatch.
One goal of the pilot project is to determine whether a self-imposed requirement to land and count against the Cooperative’s catch limits all fish that appear to be mortally wounded, as long as the vessel holds unused red snapper distributions and has not reached its bag limits, can reduce dead discards. Cooperative members may also test methods of reducing mortality of fish that are released.
(6) Conservation and management measures shall, to the extent practicable, promote the safety of human life at sea.
Instead of being forced to fish during the short open seasons for red snapper participants in the Cooperative can fish until the federal season for red snapper closes adding more flexibility and can reschedule trips to avoid taking customers fishing in bad weather. The pilot program will explore whether a cooperative system could improve safety in the for-hire sector.
In addition, enhanced data collection for biological and socio-economic purposes will help measure the impacts of the pilot program and its success in achieving its goals. This includes targeted ecological goals. For example, by carefully monitoring catch in a real-time basis, Cooperative participants will test whether this alternative management system will help prevent overfishing and achieve optimum yield under MSA, and whether it significantly improves data collection. By providing flexibility to fishermen in when they fish, requiring Cooperative members to retain and count against their catch limits all legal-sized fish that are mortally wounded (instead of discarding or releasing such fish), and requiring Cooperative members to cease targeting red snapper upon exhausting their individual catch limits, this project also seeks to reduce regulatory discards that are wasteful and contribute to overages. By distributing effort over longer spatial and temporal scales, the pilot project attempts to prevent localized overfishing.
Economically, the charter for hire pilot will test a management approach that improves accountability in the fishery while giving participants the flexibility that is critical to running a business. Fishermen can schedule their trips to take advantage of market, weather, fishery and customer needs, and other conditions. Cooperative participants will also test the ability to achieve management, business and employment stability under a more rationalized system, with the goal of increasing the economic viability of coastal fishing businesses that contribute to local economies. Fishermen will test whether they can provide sustainable jobs through long-term, non-seasonal crews in this alternative management system.
U.S. experience with commercial fishing rationalization demonstrates that allocation-based tools such as IFQs and harvest cooperatives have been successful in achieving economic and biological management goals. Allocation-based tools have successfully aligned fisheries management goals with industry incentives. Similar to commercial fishing, regulations can incentivize a race to fish and result in excessive investment in capital and trip inputs. Despite being under a limited access system, biological and industry outcomes observed in the for-hire industry, and in particular in the red snapper segment of the reef fish fishery, resemble those observed in overcapitalized commercial derby fisheries. The Gulf of Mexico charter for hire industry has experienced shorter seasons and lower customer bag limits under new recreational fishing constraints. As recreational contributions to fishing mortality increase for several species in the Gulf of Mexico, we believe that there could be a role for allocation-based management and improved accountability. This pilot project, while not a comprehensive rationalization program, may help determine whether such an approach would be an appropriate regulatory response to solve longstanding problems observed in the charter for hire industry.
7.0 For each vessel to be covered by the EFP, as soon as the information is available and before operations begin under the EFP:
(A) A copy of the USCG documentation, state license, or registration of each vessel, or the information contained on the appropriate document.
(B) The current name, address, and telephone number of the owner and master, if not included on the document provided for the vessel.
In accordance with 50 C.F.R. § 600.745(b)(2)(iv), the Cooperative will provide the final list of participating vessels to NMFS, including their USCG documentation and ownership information, as soon as that information is available and before operations begin under the EFP
The maximum allowed be limited to the total number of active Alabama licensed charter for hire permitted vessels that hold an EEZ LAPP permit.
8.0 The species (target and incidental) expected to be harvested under the EFP, the amount(s) of such harvest necessary to conduct the exempted fishing, the arrangements for disposition of all regulated species harvested under the EFP, and any anticipated impacts on the environment, including impacts on fisheries, marine mammals, threatened or endangered species, and EFH.
A. NMFS/ State officials will specify the number of red snapper necessary and appropriate to conduct activities under this EFP for the listed applicants. As set forth above, these amounts will be based on the applicants equal share among all active Alabama Licensed CFH holding a EEZ CFH permit.
B. Customers of the charter for hire vessels would be allowed to keep the fish caught under the purview of the permit.
C. Since the charter for hire captains will be harvesting within the recreational quota, there will be no additional impacts to the red snapper fisheries. The recreational fishing seasons for non-participating vessels will not be affected by this EFP, because the participating vessels will catch the same proportion of fish under this EFP that they caught during prior seasons. The recreational sector as a whole could benefit from reduced discards and accurate, real-time monitoring of catches by participating vessels, given that one management problem observed in that sector is frequent exceeding of catch limits. Moreover, the EFP itself could help reduce overages in the recreational sector because the
participating vessels would not be contributing to any excess harvests during the general recreational open seasons.
D. We do not believe the EFP will cause any impacts to marine mammals, threatened or endangered species, or EFH. The entire vertical-line recreational fishery for all Gulf reef fish through the Gulf of Mexico is estimated to result in 125 sea turtle interactions annually, or 375 takes over a three-year period. See ESA Section 7 Biological Opinion (Sept. 30, 2011) at 117, available at
Compared to the number of participants in the Gulf-wide recreational fishery for reef fish, the number of charter for hire vessels participating in the Cooperative is minimal and any changes to sea turtle interactions are therefore likely to be de minimis. The Gulf reef fish fishery is classified in the 2011 Marine Mammal Protection Act List of Fisheries as Category III fishery, 75 Fed. Reg. 68468 (Nov. 8, 2010). This classification indicates the annual mortality and serious injury of a marine mammal stock resulting from the fishery is less than or equal to 1% of the potential biological removal. Dolphins are the only species documented as interacting with this fishery. Bottlenose dolphins may predate and depredate on the bait, catch, and/or released discards of the reef fish fishery. Since overall fishing effort is not likely to change in a material amount, existing analyses of recreational fishing impacts under the current FMP should not change as a result of this EFP2.
9.0 For each vessel covered by the EFP, the approximate time(s) and place(s) fishing will take place, and the type, size, and amount of gear to be used.
The original intent of the Cooperative was that the EFP would be in effect for the duration of two full calendar years . Given the date of resubmission of this EFP application, however, an effective date of is not feasible. The Cooperative therefore requests that NMFS approve the EFP as soon as practicable with an effective date on a calender basis for a two year period.
The Cooperative seeks approval for participating vessels to be allowed to target red snapper for the duration of each calendar year for which the EFP is in effect, provided that they have not exceeded their catch limit. All fishing will be performed by anglers on a licensed and documented charter for hire vessel with typical recreational fishing gear (i.e., rod and reel). As noted above, the Cooperative seeks approval for up to 100% of all active Alabama CFH with EEZ LAPP Permits.

I just received this email from Bob Zales, president of the national Association of Charterboat Operators, and a charter captain out of Pensacola, FL. Sounds like this proposal was not as well thought out as they might want us to believe.

“I have talked to Greg Stunz with the Texas A&M Harte Research Institute who is listed as a “research partner” with the AL EFP proposal attached. According to Greg, while they would be very interested in providing assistance as a research partner, when I contacted him it was the first he had heard about this proposal. He also explained that there is much more to being listed than simply providing a name, which they did not do, to any such proposal. There is quite a bit of work, a number of personnel, and many other factors that go into such a project. Apparently, someone, either some with the AL for-Hire Fleet, the State of Alabama, or whoever else is involved really jumped the gun on this proposal.
According to Doug Gregory, Exec Dir of the Gulf Council, this proposal will be discussed at the council reef fish committee and comments will be received under public testimony. One has to wonder if such an egregious mistake and non permission use of an accredited research institute’s name if there are other mistakes and an ulterior motive with proposal. Surely the head of the Alabama Marine Resources Department is not party to such a mistake and/or agenda. Maybe this will be explained at the council meeting so the public can be made aware of the rationale behind this proposal.

About MikeH

Texas hunter and fisherman for 50 years, published outdoor writer since 1979, licensed charter boat operator from 1982 to 2013. Past Member, Board of Directors, National Association of Charterboat Operators, current member Environmental Advisory Committee to the DOE and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Married to Dorothy since 2000, one son, Michael who is recently married and living in Nederland, Texas. My wife and I live in Oyster Creek, Texas, near Freeport, and have a hunting property outside of Brazoria, Texas.
This entry was posted in Regulations & Rules - Saltwater Fishing. Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Tom Hilton says:

    This charterboat EFP, you will notice is being slid into the agenda at the Gulf Council along with the so-called regionalization plan which is being fast-tracked for approval by the October meeting. Although they are 2 separate items, they are veryclosely tied with one another, as the regionalization plan provide for each state to suballocate the recreational fishery into charter/private rec, otherwise known as Sector Separation (S.S.). They must first implement Sector Separation in order to then implement this charterboat EFP, since S.S. divides the recreational fish, and gives exclusive access to a portion of those fish to a select few charter boat captains or corporations, who can then sell, lease, or trade those access rights for their personal profit. The Gulf Council tabled S.S. about this time last year, deferring it until after the assessment. They still have not addressed this thorny issue and have instead decided to attempt to divert the responsibility and problems associated with it to the Gulf states. The data they will be using is egregiously flawed – bottom line – it’s a terrible idea that keeps on resurfacing due to the enviros throwing tons of money at it.

    The National Marine Fisheries (NMFS) division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been working closely with the Environment Defense Fund to create the fishing equivalent of the Obama administration’s ‘cap-and-trade’ regulatory scheme. In the world of fisheries management, this is known as ‘transactional share management’. The concept is that government experts will establish the amount of catch allowed in the Gulf of Mexico, and allocate a share of this catch to various fishing interests as we see here. Ultimately, these shares will be sold and folks who own shares can then trade them.

    Promoted as a way to create ‘sustainable fisheries’, the reality is that these folks ultimate goal is to completely shut down fishing. Exaggeration? Recall what happened with the timber industry in Oregon, in the name of protecting the spotted owl. Or maybe you’ve heard of how they’ve just about shut down all farming in the California central valley in the name of protecting the delta smelt in the Sacramento River. Major portions of the Pacific Ocean off California have likewise been shut down to all fishing.

    In the same way we’ve seen the Obama Administration use ‘a good crisis’ to accomplish other radical policy objectives, what will happen in Texas is the experts will manipulate their estimates of the fish in the oceans and publish phony numbers, with the intention continue to project declining fish populations. The resulting crisis serves as justification to reduce the annual ‘total allowable catch’, down, down, down until we get to a complete closure of all recreational red snapper fishing in Texas and across the Gulf but with a waiver for powerful ‘commercial’ fishing in the name of protecting jobs and families.

    Most shocking is that Texas Parks and Wildlife appears complicit in enacting this scheme in Texas. Currently in the final stages of approval and likely to be enacted this fall, TPWD is openly promoting this new catch-share scheme under the guise of ‘regional management’. Once enacted, shares will be allocated based on estimates of previous year catches by various fishing groups. TPWD is manipulating the numbers by publishing comically low catch rates by our charter fishing fleet. As a result, this group of fisherman will get a catch share that will be so small the effect will be to immediately put most out of business. With the charter fleet shut down, we can expect continued phony fish population estimates that will result in a gradual shut down of recreational fishing as well.

  2. MikeH says:

    Tom, thanks for your comment. You and I are in agreement on this thing. For those now keeping up with the fisheries fiasco, certain people in the government and the industry, egged on by enviros who would like to end all fishing, are trying to turn fish into a commodity to be bought and sold in “shares”. This has been going on in the commercial sector, for some time, but is getting worse. New proposals would allow people who do not have a commercial permit – or even own a boat – to buy “shares” of snapper quota. They can’t fish for their quota without permits, but they can either sit on them or sell them for a profit.

    This is not something I can support, to say the least.

Comments are closed.